1001Ferramentas
🌊Converters

AC Voltage Converter: Peak-to-Peak to RMS

Convert peak-to-peak voltage to RMS on a sine wave: Vrms = Vpp/(2√2). Peak-to-peak is what you read off the scope; RMS is what sizes the power.

Vrms (V)

Peak-to-peak to RMS for oscilloscope readings

On an oscilloscope the most direct measurement is peak-to-peak voltage: the vertical distance between the top and the bottom of the trace, no ground reference required. This page converts that Vpp into an RMS value for sine waves: Vrms = Vpp / (2√2), which means dividing by 2.8284. The default input of 622 V peak-to-peak returns 219.91 V RMS — that is 220 V mains as seen on a scope, swinging 311 V up and 311 V down. On a 120 V system, the same wave measures about 340 Vpp.

The formula chains two steps. For a symmetric sine, Vpp = 2 Vp, so Vp = Vpp/2; and the RMS of a sine is Vp/√2. Combined: Vrms = Vpp/(2√2) ≈ 0.3536 Vpp. Both assumptions matter. If the waveform is not a sine, the factor changes — a square wave gives Vrms = Vpp/2 and a triangle Vpp/(2√3) ≈ 0.2887 Vpp. And if the signal rides on a DC offset, Vpp stays the same while the true RMS grows, because the DC component adds in quadrature: Vrms² = Vdc² + Vac_rms². A single number cannot carry any of that information, and the tool has no way to guess it.

A practical workflow: measure Vpp on the scope with AC coupling engaged (to strip any offset), confirm the shape is sinusoidal, then convert here. A sanity check in the other direction helps too — a 10 Vpp sine should read 3.536 V RMS on a true-RMS meter; a large disagreement means the waveform is not a sine or an offset slipped in. The page converts one way only, whatever the double arrow in the title suggests; to go from RMS back to peak-to-peak, multiply by 2.8284. It performs no input validation either — negative numbers pass through silently and yield a negative RMS with no physical meaning.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Vpp, Vpeak and Vrms?
For a symmetric sine, the peak (Vp) is the amplitude measured from zero; peak-to-peak (Vpp) is the distance from crest to trough, twice the peak; and RMS is the effective value, Vp divided by the square root of 2. Mains at 220 V shows all three: 311 V peak, 622 V peak-to-peak, 220 V RMS. They describe the same signal — change one and the others follow.
Why measure peak-to-peak instead of peak?
On a scope, Vpp is the most robust reading: it is the vertical distance between the top and bottom of the trace and does not require knowing where the zero reference sits. The conversion to RMS, however, assumes a symmetric sine with no DC offset — if a DC component is present, switch to AC coupling first, or the division by 2.8284 will not match the true RMS.
Does the 2.8284 factor work for square or triangle waves?
No. It is 2 times the square root of 2 and holds only for sines. A symmetric square wave has an RMS equal to half its Vpp (factor 2); a triangle wave, Vpp divided by 2 times the square root of 3, about 0.2887 x Vpp. Applying 2.8284 to a square wave underestimates the effective value by almost 30% — check the waveform on screen before converting.

Related Tools