Battery AAA vs AA Energy
Compares total energy stored by AAA and AA alkaline batteries in mAh.
—
AAA vs AA battery energy
A typical alkaline AAA cell holds something like 1,000-1,200 mAh. The alkaline AA next to it carries 2,500-3,000 mAh, so at the same 1.5 V you're looking at roughly 2-3x more energy in the bigger size. Go to lithium AA and capacity climbs past 3,000 mAh, with a noticeable edge in the cold. The rechargeable NiMH AA lands around 2,000-2,500 mAh, but at 1.2 V.
Take a 4-pack of alkaline AA: that works out to about 4 · 2,800 mAh · 1.5 V ≈ 16.8 Wh. The same four cells in AAA land near ~6.6 Wh.
Applications
Use it to match the cell to what the device actually asks for. A remote or a clock barely sips current, so AAA is fine there. Motorized toys, flashlights and a camera flash pull hard, and those want AA. The numbers also help when you're working out cost per kWh, weighing alkaline against lithium and NiMH, or just deciding which size to buy when the gadget accepts either.
FAQ
Same voltage, different capacity, why? Both alkaline cells sit at 1.5 V. The AA just packs more chemistry inside, so it holds more charge (mAh).
Can I swap AAA for AA with an adapter? It fits, sure. But all you get is the AAA's capacity; the rest of the AA shell is hollow.
Are lithium batteries always better? They run longer and shrug off the cold, but they also cost 3-5x as much. In a low-drain device that money is mostly thrown away.
Related Tools
Capacitor Stored Energy Calculator
Computes the energy stored in a capacitor from capacitance in farads and voltage in volts using half C V squared.
Inductor Stored Energy Calculator
Computes the energy stored in an inductor from inductance in henrys and current in amperes using half L I squared.
Grain Conical Pile Volume
Calculate the volume of a conical pile of granular material formed by free pouring, V = (π/3)·r³·tan(θ), from the pile base radius r (m) and the material's angle of repose θ (degrees). When granular material is freely poured onto a surface, it naturally forms a CONE whose side slope is the angle of repose — a characteristic property of each material (dry sand ~30-35°, grain ~25-30°, crushed stone ~37-40°) reflecting inter-particle friction. Since the cone height is h = r·tan(θ), the cone volume (1/3·π·r²·h) becomes (π/3)·r³·tan(θ), a function of radius and angle of repose only. This is widely used in practice to estimate, from a survey or base-radius measurement, the volume (and with density, the mass) of open stockpiles — piles of grain, sand, crushed stone, coal, ore, fertilizer in yards and warehouses. It is the basis of bulk-material inventory in piles, a quick alternative to weighing. It also guides stockyard area and height sizing and bulk-warehouse design. For elongated piles (prismatic with conical ends), add the central part. Enter the base radius and the angle of repose.
Buller-Woodrow Loss Factor
Estimates the loss factor of a distribution feeder from its load factor using the empirical Buller-Woodrow relation: loss factor = k × load factor + (1 − k) × load factor squared. The loss factor is the ratio of average loss to peak loss over the period, and it is what turns the instantaneous loss measured at peak hour into energy lost over the month without needing a recorded load curve. Because Joule loss varies with the square of the current, the loss factor always sits below the load factor, and the lower the load factor the lower the ratio between them: at a load factor of 0.20 the loss factor is under half of it, while at 0.80 it sits around 86% of its value. The coefficient k is an input rather than fixed at 0.30, the classic Buller-Woodrow value for distribution networks, because utilities recalibrate k between 0.15 and 0.50 according to the feeder load profile. Enter the load factor for the period and the coefficient k.
Energy Dissipated per Cycle
Calculate the energy dissipated per cycle in a viscous damper, ΔE = π·c·ω·X², from the viscous damping coefficient c, the excitation frequency ω (rad/s) and the vibration amplitude X. The result, in joules, is the mechanical energy converted to heat each oscillation cycle by the damper — proportional to frequency and to the square of amplitude. Quantifying it is essential to size dampers and dissipators (in suspensions, buildings under earthquakes, isolators) and to estimate the heat generated by vibration. The greater the dissipation, the faster free vibration decays. Enter the damping coefficient, the frequency and the amplitude.
Arc Flash Incident Energy (Lee Method)
Computes arc flash incident energy by the Ralph Lee method, E = 5.12×10⁵ × V × I_bf × t ÷ d², with voltage in kV, bolted fault current in kA, fault clearing time in seconds and working distance in millimetres. Lee's method models an open-air arc as an ideal radiant heat source, ignoring the energy an enclosure reflects back; IEEE 1584 therefore keeps it only as the legacy model, recommended for open-air arcs and for voltages above 15 kV where the empirical equations do not apply. The result in cal/cm² sets the PPE category: 1.2 cal/cm² is the second-degree burn threshold and the value that bounds the arc flash boundary. The cal/cm² form is adopted (the J/cm² variant uses 2.142×10⁶ and is 4.184 times larger). Enter the voltage, the fault current, the clearing time and the working distance.
The results provided by this tool are for general informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute professional, financial, medical, legal, tax or accounting advice. Always confirm important decisions with a qualified professional and official sources.