Journal Impact Factor
Compute JIF = citations / articles published in the two prior years.
JIF
—
Journal Impact Factor: IF = citations(X) / articles(X-1, X-2)
The Impact Factor (IF) is the average number of citations that articles from a journal pick up in year X, counting only the papers it ran in the two prior years (X-1 and X-2). Clarivate publishes it once a year in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR), drawing on the Web of Science database. To give a sense of the top of the field: Cancer Cell sits around 280, The Lancet around 202, the New England Journal of Medicine around 167, Nature around 70, Science around 63, and PNAS around 12. So if a journal got 500 citations in 2025 for the 120 articles it published across 2023–2024, that works out to IF = 500/120 ≈ 4.17.
Applications
It shows up in CAPES Qualis classification (Brazil), in deciding where to submit a paper, in hiring and promotion criteria for faculty, in how grants get evaluated, and in what libraries choose to subscribe to.
FAQ
Why is IF criticized? It varies a lot by field, with engineering IFs running well below medicine. A handful of heavily cited papers can drag the whole number up, and editorial policies can game it without much effort. Back in 2012 the DORA Declaration came out against treating IF as the one number that decides the worth of an individual's research.
What are the alternatives? There's the h-index at the researcher level, SJR and SNIP if you want field-normalized figures, CiteScore from Elsevier/Scopus, Eigenfactor, and Altmetric for mentions in social media and the news.
Is a high IF always better? Not really. A niche journal with an IF of 3 might reach your specific community far better than a general one with an IF of 8. Think about who actually reads it, not just the figure on the page.
Related Tools
Citations Per Paper
Compute average citations per paper = total citations / total papers.
Clinker Lime Saturation Factor (LSF)
Computes the lime saturation factor of raw meal or clinker, the index that tells how close the lime present sits to the maximum that silica, alumina and iron oxide could combine with: LSF = 100 × CaO ÷ (2.8 × SiO₂ + 1.18 × Al₂O₃ + 0.65 × Fe₂O₃), with contents as mass percentages. It is the number one parameter in cement kiln control because it governs the split between alite and belite: a value near 100 means nearly all the lime combines and the clinker comes out rich in C₃S, with good early strength, but it demands a hotter burn and a narrow operating margin. Above 100 free lime is left over, hydrating late and expanding in concrete; below 90 the clinker is poor in alite and 3-day strength drops. The form without free lime correction was adopted, as used in raw meal control; on burnt clinker some laboratories subtract free CaO from the numerator, which lowers the index by one or two points. Enter the CaO, SiO₂, Al₂O₃ and Fe₂O₃ contents of the sample.
Rubber Apparent Compression Modulus
Computes the apparent compression modulus of a rubber block squeezed between two bonded plates, Ec = E₀ × (1 + 2 × k × S²), where E₀ is the Young's modulus of the compound, k is a numerical constant tabulated by hardness (running from about 0.93 for soft 30 IRHD rubber to 0.53 for hard 75 IRHD) and S is the shape factor, which for a circular block equals the diameter divided by four times the thickness. Rubber is essentially incompressible in volume, so what resists the load is not compression of the material but friction on the bonded faces, which stops the sides from bulging; that is why the apparent modulus can sit many times above the compound's own Young's modulus. The result, in megapascals, is what you use to get the vertical stiffness of the mount (stiffness = Ec × area ÷ thickness) and from there the natural frequency of the isolated system. Because the shape factor is S = D ÷ 4t and the dominant term goes with S squared, diameter and thickness are levers of equal weight and opposite sign: halving the thickness and doubling the diameter do exactly the same thing, and in the example both take the apparent modulus from 11.3 to 35.3 MPa — a thin mount is a stiff mount, and that ruins vibration isolation. Enter the compound's Young's modulus, the constant k, the block diameter and the thickness.
Recipe Scaling Calculator
Multiplies one ingredient amount by target servings over original servings, so 200 g for 4 people becomes 300 g for 6; run it once per ingredient.
Bearing PV Factor
Calculate the PV factor of a bearing or self-lubricating bushing, PV = P × V, multiplying the specific pressure P (load over projected area) by the sliding velocity V at the surface. The result, in MPa·m/s, is the limiting criterion for selecting materials for non-force-lubricated bearings (sintered bronze bushings, polymers like PTFE and nylon): each material has a maximum allowable PV value, above which the friction heat cannot be dissipated and the bearing fails by melting or accelerated wear. PV is kept below the material limit with a safety margin. Enter the specific pressure and the velocity.
Serial Dilution Total Factor Calculator
Give the ratio per step (10 means 1:10) and the number of steps to get the combined factor 1:r^n, so 5 steps at 1:10 return 1:1.00e+5.
The results provided by this tool are for general informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute professional, financial, medical, legal, tax or accounting advice. Always confirm important decisions with a qualified professional and official sources.