Quadratic Roots and Discriminant Calculator
Enter a, b and c to get b² − 4ac and the two solutions of ax² + bx + c = 0, real when that value is zero or positive and complex when it is negative.
Raízes
—
Quadratic roots via discriminant
To solve a quadratic equation ax² + bx + c = 0 (assuming a ≠ 0), you use x = (-b ± √Δ)/(2a), with the discriminant given by Δ = b² - 4ac. Its sign tells you what kind of roots to expect. When Δ > 0 you get two distinct real roots; when Δ = 0 there's a single repeated real root; and when Δ < 0 the two roots are complex conjugates.
Example: take x² - 5x + 6 = 0. Here Δ = 25 - 24 = 1, so x = (5 ± 1)/2 and the roots are 3 and 2. You can double-check with Girard's relations: the sum S = -b/a = 5 and the product P = c/a = 6 both work out.
Applications
Quadratics describe projectile trajectories under constant gravity and turn up in geometric optics (parabolic mirrors and lenses), in engineering optimisation (areas, structural curves), and again and again in the ENEM and university entrance exams. The "Bhaskara formula" name is a Brazilian classroom tradition more than an accurate credit. Al-Khwarizmi (~820) was already solving quadratics geometrically, while Bhaskara II (12th c.) contributed mostly to related algebra and to negative roots.
FAQ
What if a = 0? Then it isn't a quadratic at all. The equation drops to linear form (bx + c = 0) and the discriminant has nothing to act on.
What does Δ mean geometrically? The parabola y = ax² + bx + c meets the x-axis exactly at the real roots. With Δ > 0 it crosses twice, with Δ = 0 it just touches, and with Δ < 0 it never reaches the axis.
What are complex conjugate roots? Whenever Δ < 0, the roots take the form x = -b/(2a) ± i·√(-Δ)/(2a). They arrive in pairs that share the same real part but carry opposite imaginary parts.
How do I factor using the roots? Call the roots r₁ and r₂. The polynomial then factors as ax² + bx + c = a(x - r₁)(x - r₂).
Related Tools
Quadratic Equation Solver
Solve quadratic equations (ax² + bx + c = 0) with the quadratic formula. Shows the discriminant Δ and real roots.
Theoretical Methane Yield (Buswell)
Computes the theoretical methane yield of a substrate with the Buswell equation, which closes the stoichiometric balance of anaerobic digestion of a CₙHₐO_bN_c compound into methane, carbon dioxide and ammonia: each mole of substrate yields (4n + a − 2b − 3c) ÷ 8 moles of methane, and dividing that by the molar mass and multiplying by the 22.414 L/mol molar volume gives the yield in litres of methane per gram at normal conditions, 0 °C and 1 atm. The less oxygen the molecule already carries, the more reduced it is and the more methane it yields: cellulose and glucose land at 0.41 and 0.37 L/g with 50% methane in the biogas, while a fat such as tristearin exceeds 1.02 L/g and reaches 71% methane — the methane fraction of the biogas is exactly (4n + a − 2b − 3c) ÷ 8n, since all the substrate carbon leaves either as methane or as carbon dioxide. The value is a thermodynamic ceiling, not a design forecast: in practice a digester delivers 60% to 80% of it, because part of the substrate becomes bacterial biomass and part never becomes accessible to the enzymes within the available retention time. Enter the number of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen atoms in the substrate's empirical formula.
Thin Lens Focal Length
Computes focal length f via 1/f=1/o+1/i from object and image distances in centimeters.
Clinker C3S Content (Bogue)
Estimates the tricalcium silicate content, the alite or C₃S, of a clinker using the Bogue equation, the mass balance that splits the four main oxides among the mineral phases: C₃S = 4.071 × CaO − 7.600 × SiO₂ − 6.718 × Al₂O₃ − 1.430 × Fe₂O₃, with contents as mass percentages. Alite is the phase that gives cement its early strength, and ordinary Portland clinker sits between 50% and 65% — below that the 3-day and 7-day strengths collapse, above that kiln fuel consumption rises and the heat of hydration becomes a problem in mass concrete. The negative coefficients are large, so the result is very sensitive to the chemical analysis: half a point more silica knocks 3.8 points off C₃S, and a composition outside the clinker range can even return a negative value, which simply means that mixture has not enough lime to form alite. The classic four-term Bogue equation was adopted, the one for clinker without gypsum; for finished cement the ASTM C150 version also subtracts 2.852 × SO₃ and discounts free lime from CaO. Enter the CaO, SiO₂, Al₂O₃ and Fe₂O₃ contents.
Cutting Force by the Kienzle Equation
Computes the main cutting force with the Kienzle equation, F_c = k_c1.1 · b · h^(1 − m_c), where k_c1.1 is the tabulated specific cutting force of the workpiece material for a reference chip section of 1 mm × 1 mm, b is the chip width and h the chip thickness, and m_c is the exponent describing the size effect. That is exactly where it differs from the direct calculation F_c = k_s·b·h: the latter treats specific pressure as a material constant, while Kienzle embeds the experimental fact that thin chips cost far more force per unit area, because the cutting edge radius stops being negligible next to the chip thickness. With k_c1.1 = 1500 N/mm² and m_c = 0.26, a 0.2 mm thick chip works at 2279 N/mm², 52 % above the tabulated value — which is why very low feeds raise the power spent per cubic millimetre removed, and the tool wear with it, instead of saving them — even though the absolute force falls. Since k_c1.1 carries a hidden millimetre raised to m_c, the equation is not dimensionally pure: thickness and width have to be entered in millimetres, and switching units is off by orders of magnitude. Enter the specific force k_c1.1, the exponent m_c, the chip width and the chip thickness.
Glass Transition Temperature (Fox)
Calculate the glass transition temperature (Tg) of a blend or copolymer by the Fox equation, 1 ÷ Tg = w₁/Tg₁ + w₂/Tg₂, from the mass fraction w₁ of component 1 (with w₂ = 1 − w₁) and the Tg of each pure component (in kelvin). The result, in K, is the temperature at which the mixture goes from the glassy (rigid) to the rubbery (flexible) state. The Fox equation predicts the Tg of miscible blends, random copolymers and plasticized systems, the basis for tuning a polymer's flexibility by adding plasticizers or comonomers. Enter the mass fraction of component 1 and the two Tg values.
The results provided by this tool are for general informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute professional, financial, medical, legal, tax or accounting advice. Always confirm important decisions with a qualified professional and official sources.