Capacitors in Parallel
Sum capacitances of parallel capacitors. Values in μF, one per line.
Equivalente: — μF
Capacitors in parallel
Wire capacitors in parallel and the equivalent capacitance is just their sum: Ctotal = C₁ + C₂ + … + Cn. Each one sees the same voltage, which means the lowest voltage rating in the group sets the ceiling for the whole bank. The charges add up too, Qtotal = Q₁ + Q₂ + …, and the same goes for stored energy. This is how you get large capacitance out of cheaper, smaller parts, and it lets you blend different technologies to cover a wider frequency range. Example: a 100 µF aluminum electrolytic alongside a 220 µF one gives you 320 µF at the same voltage rating. Throw a 100 nF ceramic into the parallel mix and the bulk capacitance barely moves, but your high-frequency decoupling gets a lot better, since ceramics carry far less ESR and ESL than electrolytics do.
Applications: power supply filtering and power factor correction
You'll see this most often in power supply filtering. Parallel banks of electrolytic caps (bulk, low frequency) sit next to ceramics (decoupling, high frequency) to smooth ripple coming off the rectifiers and kill switching noise right beside each IC. In industry, power factor correction (PFC) banks placed in parallel with inductive motors cut the reactive power (kVAR) and keep the utility from charging penalties. Supercapacitors get paralleled to bank up a lot of energy at low voltage for backup duty and regenerative braking. Audio crossovers, snubbers and EMI filters lean on the same trick, stacking parallel capacitors of mixed values.
FAQ
Why mix electrolytic and ceramic in parallel? An electrolytic holds plenty of charge but reacts slowly thanks to its high ESR and ESL. A ceramic is tiny yet keeps up with MHz transients. Put them together and you've got the whole frequency range covered.
What about different voltage ratings? The lowest one wins. Pair a 10 V with a 50 V and you still can't safely go past 10 V.
Why do PFC banks use parallel and not series? Motors call for more reactive compensation, so the capacitance has to add rather than divide. Going parallel also leaves the full line voltage across each capacitor.
Is there a limit to how many I can parallel? Not electrically. The catch is inrush current at power-on, which climbs with total C, so large banks want a soft-start circuit.
Related Tools
Capacitors in Series
Compute equivalent capacitance of series capacitors. Values in μF, one per line.
Series & Parallel Capacitor Calculator
Compute equivalent capacitance in series (1/Σ(1/C)) or parallel (sum). Inverse of resistor rule.
Capacitors in Parallel Calculator
Adds two capacitances in farads to get the equivalent value, Cp = C1 + C2. For example 1 µF plus 4.7 µF gives 5.7 µF, because parallel plates add.
Parallel Resistor Calculator
Compute the equivalent resistance of up to 10 resistors in parallel (Req = 1 / Σ(1/Ri)). Also shows the series total for comparison. Everything in your browser.
Output Voltage Ripple
Calculate the output voltage ripple of a switching converter, ΔV = I ÷ (f × C), from the output current I, the switching frequency f and the output capacitance C. The result, in volts, is the residual oscillation superimposed on the DC output voltage, caused by the filter capacitor charging and discharging each switching cycle. Higher frequency and capacitance reduce the ripple. Keeping the ripple within limits (typically <1% of the output) is essential to supply sensitive circuits. Enter the current, the switching frequency and the capacitance.
RC Time Constant Calculator
Compute the time constant τ = R × C of an RC circuit, cutoff frequency, and charge time to 63%, 95% and 99%. Useful for filters and timers. Everything in your browser.
The results provided by this tool are for general informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute professional, financial, medical, legal, tax or accounting advice. Always confirm important decisions with a qualified professional and official sources.