1001Ferramentas
🌡️ Calculators

Elenbaas Number

Computes the Elenbaas number of a channel formed by two heated vertical parallel plates, El = g·β·ΔT·b⁴ ÷ (ν·α·H), which is the Rayleigh number based on the plate spacing b multiplied by the ratio b/H. It governs natural convection in finned heat sinks, electronics enclosures and solar collectors: a very small El means a narrow, tall channel where the boundary layers merge and choke the flow, while a large El means the plates behave as isolated. The spacing that maximises a heat sink's total dissipation falls near El ≈ 46 for isothermal plates, a classic natural-convection fin design criterion. Gravity is taken as 9.80665 m/s², β is the fluid thermal expansion coefficient and H the plate height. Enter the expansion coefficient, the temperature difference, the spacing, the kinematic viscosity, the thermal diffusivity and the plate height.

Result

Elenbaas Number: optimum spacing for vertical fins

A fanless heat sink runs into one trade-off on the first design pass: more fins give more area, yet they squeeze the channel until the boundary layers meet and the air stops rising. Anyone who has measured such a prototype knows the outcome — junction temperature climbs right after fins were added. The Elenbaas number tells you which side of that trade-off a chosen spacing lands on, and it reads the same way for a sealed enclosure, a finned transformer tank or a solar collector.

El = g·β·ΔT·b⁴ ÷ (ν·α·H) is the spacing-based Rayleigh number multiplied by b/H. Gravity is fixed at 9.80665 m/s², β is the fluid thermal expansion coefficient (1/T_film for an ideal gas), ΔT the plate-to-ambient difference, b the spacing, ν the kinematic viscosity, α the thermal diffusivity and H the plate height. That fourth power on the spacing rules everything: a 10 percent error in b moves El by 46 percent. The classic target for maximum total dissipation sits near El = 46 for isothermal plates, though different correlations place it anywhere from 28 to 55, so read it as a band rather than a magic value.

The correlation came from flat vertical isothermal plates with the channel open top and bottom, surrounded by still air, in laminar flow. It stops applying once a fan runs, once the top of the channel is blocked, or with tilted fins and pin-fin arrays. Radiation stays outside the model and is no footnote: on a black anodised sink it carries 20 to 40 percent of the heat, which shifts the real optimum spacing. Fluid properties belong at film temperature, and b and H belong in metres — entering b in millimetres inflates El by a factor of a trillion.

Frequently asked questions

Does the default El = 75.69 mean the spacing is right?
It says the 8 mm gap is generous. With air near 345 K, a 40 K rise and a 120 mm tall plate, the channel already behaves almost like two isolated plates, so width across the sink is going to waste. Since El grows with the fourth power of b, reaching the target of 46 takes 8 × (46/75.69) raised to 0.25, close to 7.1 mm, which leaves room for extra fins without choking the flow. Confirm by simulation or measurement, as the target moves with the correlation you adopt.
Where do the β, ν and α values in the form come from?
They are fluid properties evaluated at film temperature, the average of plate and ambient. For air treated as an ideal gas, β is just 1/T_film: the 0.0029 1/K in the field corresponds to 345 K, or 72 °C. The 1.9 × 10⁻⁵ m²/s kinematic viscosity and the 2.7 × 10⁻⁵ m²/s thermal diffusivity belong to air in that same range. A quick sanity check before trusting the output: ν divided by α must give the Prandtl number, near 0.70 for air.
Can I use this with a plate colder than the surrounding air?
The calculator rejects a ΔT of zero or less, along with any of the six fields at zero or negative, showing 'Check the values you entered.' while the result falls back to a dash. For a cold plate, enter the magnitude of the difference: the Elenbaas number comes out the same, only the flow runs downward instead of upward and the top of the channel becomes the inlet. Everything else reads alike, as long as the assembly stays vertical and open at both ends.

Related Tools

Flash Guide Number by Distance

Returns ideal aperture from flash Guide Number and subject distance.

🔥

Zeldovich Number

Computes the Zeldovich number of a flame, β = E_a·(T_b − T_u) ÷ (R·T_b²), the activation energy made dimensionless by the temperature rise across the flame front. It measures how sensitive the reaction rate is to a small temperature change: a high β (typically 8 to 12 for hydrocarbons) means the reaction is concentrated in a very thin layer near the flame temperature, which justifies the large-activation-energy assumption of asymptotic flame theory and the extinction and cellular-instability criteria. The universal gas constant R = 8.314 J/(mol·K) is adopted, with activation energy in J/mol and temperatures in kelvin. Enter the activation energy, the burned gas temperature and the unburned gas temperature.

🏭

Number of Transfer Units (NTU)

Compute the number of transfer units (NTU) of an absorption or stripping column (dilute case), NTU = ln(C_in/C_out), from the inlet and outlet concentrations. NTU measures the 'difficulty' of the separation: the greater the removal desired, the more transfer units are needed. Together with the height of a unit (HTU), it defines the total packing height. Enter the inlet and outlet concentrations.

🔥

Karlovitz Number

Computes the Karlovitz number of a turbulent premixed flame, Ka = (u'/S_L)^1.5 · (ℓ_t/δ_L)^−0.5, comparing the chemical time of the flame front with the turnover time of the smallest eddies (Kolmogorov scale). Ka below 1 means the laminar flame structure survives the turbulence (wrinkled and corrugated regimes); between 1 and 100 eddies penetrate the preheat zone and thicken the flame; above 100 the reaction zone itself is broken. Together with the Damköhler number it forms the axes of the Borghi diagram, used to pick combustion models in CFD. Peters' form is adopted; integral scale and flame thickness must share the same unit. Enter the velocity fluctuation, the laminar flame speed, the integral length scale and the laminar flame thickness.

🌡️

Brake Temperature Rise

Estimate a brake's temperature rise from one braking, ΔT = E ÷ (m·c), from the braking dissipated energy E (J), the mass of the heat-absorbing component m (kg, the disc or drum) and the material specific heat c (J/(kg·°C), ~460 for steel, ~900 for aluminum). When a brake dissipates a braking's kinetic energy (converting it to heat), this heat is initially ABSORBED by the disc or drum mass, raising its temperature. This formula estimates that rise assuming ALL the heat goes into the component mass, with no loss to the environment (a conservative assumption, valid for a quick, isolated braking — in prolonged braking, part of the heat is dissipated by convection and radiation simultaneously). The temperature rise is critical because friction materials have a thermal limit: above a certain temperature (300-500°C for organic materials, more for metallic/ceramic), friction drops sharply (the FADING phenomenon, which has caused many mountain-descent accidents), the material degrades, and the disc can warp or crack from thermal shock. So severe-duty brakes use large discs (more mass, more heat-absorbing capacity), vented (more dissipation) and high-melting-point materials. This calculation is the heart of brake THERMAL design. Enter the dissipated energy, the mass and the specific heat.

🐙

Octopus Hearts

Shows the number of octopus hearts and their function.

The results provided by this tool are for general informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute professional, financial, medical, legal, tax or accounting advice. Always confirm important decisions with a qualified professional and official sources.