1001Ferramentas
📏 Calculators

Ideal Diameter of Hardenability (ASTM A255)

Computes the Grossmann ideal diameter D_I using the calculated hardenability method of ASTM A255: it starts from the carbon base diameter, D_I = 0.54·√(%C) inches for ASTM grain size No. 7, and multiplies it by the alloy factors (1 + 3.3333·Mn)·(1 + 0.7·Si)·(1 + 2.16·Cr)·(1 + 0.363·Ni)·(1 + 3.0·Mo). The result, already converted to millimetres, is the bar diameter that would still quench to 50 % martensite at its centre in an ideal cooling medium — that is, the index ranking steels by hardening DEPTH, not by peak hardness, which depends almost only on carbon. Because the factors are multiplicative rather than additive, 1 % manganese alone multiplies hardenability by 4.33 while the same 1 % nickel raises it by just 36 % — the order of potency is manganese, molybdenum, chromium, silicon and nickel, and it is why nickel earns its place in engineering steels through toughness rather than hardenability. One reading caveat: D_I is the diameter that would through-harden in an ideal quench of infinite severity — in oil the real critical diameter lands between a third and a half of it. The manganese factor holds up to 1.2 %, beyond which the standard switches expression, and the page rejects it from there on. Enter the carbon, manganese, silicon, chromium, nickel and molybdenum contents.

Result

Ideal Diameter of Hardenability from ASTM A255

The peak hardness a steel can reach depends almost entirely on carbon. The depth at which that hardness appears depends on the alloy, and that is a different story — it is why 1045 and 4140, at similar carbon levels, behave in opposite ways on an 80 mm shaft. The ideal diameter D_I ranks steels by that depth in a single number in millimetres. It serves to pick between two steel offers, to judge whether a heat that came in at the low end of the composition band still hardens the part, and to justify swapping one grade for another.

The calculated hardenability method of ASTM A255 starts from carbon and multiplies: D_I = 0.54·√(%C) inches, valid for ASTM grain size No. 7, times (1 + 3.3333·Mn)·(1 + 0.7·Si)·(1 + 2.16·Cr)·(1 + 0.363·Ni)·(1 + 3.0·Mo). The page outputs millimetres. With the defaults, a 4140 composition (0.40 C / 0.90 Mn / 0.25 Si / 0.95 Cr / 0.20 Mo), the base is 0.3415 in and the factors 4.000, 1.175, 3.052 and 1.600, giving 7.84 in, or 199.1 mm. The cross-check comes from the standard itself, which tabulates 4.333 for 1.00 % Mn: enter C = 1.00 and Mn = 1.00 with the rest at zero and the page prints 59.4 mm, which is 0.54 × 4.3333 = 2.340 in. A 1045 (0.45 C / 0.75 Mn / 0.25 Si) returns 37.8 mm, 1.49 in.

D_I is the diameter that would harden in a quenchant of infinite severity, which nothing matches. Reaching the real critical diameter means carrying D_I into the Grossmann chart together with the severity H of the medium — near 1.0 for agitated water, 0.35 for oil, 0.02 for air — and the figure drops sharply. The criterion is not full hardness either: it is 50 % martensite at the centre. The 0.54·√(%C) base assumes ASTM grain size 7, and this page has no grain size field. The linear manganese factor holds only to 1.2 %; above that the page still accepts entries, up to 2 %, and overestimates. Boron, worth a 1.5 to 3 times multiplier, has no field, and none of this covers undissolved alloy.

Frequently asked questions

Is the ideal diameter the largest bar I can harden?
No. It is the diameter that would reach 50 % martensite at its centre if the quenchant were ideal, with an infinite ability to pull heat out. Real media fall far short: in oil, severity H near 0.35, the actual critical diameter usually lands between a third and a half of D_I. That conversion comes from the Grossmann chart, which this page does not carry.
Why does manganese count for so much more than nickel?
Because the factors measured by the standard differ sharply: 1 % manganese multiplies hardenability by 4.333, while 1 % nickel multiplies it by only 1.363. Manganese, molybdenum and chromium buy depth cheaply; nickel goes into engineering steels mainly for low-temperature toughness, not for hardening depth.
Can I use the tool for boron-treated steel?
Not accurately. ASTM A255 handles boron through a separate factor that depends on carbon content and can triple D_I at only a few ppm, and this page offers fields for carbon, manganese, silicon, chromium, nickel and molybdenum alone. For a 15B30 or equivalent grade the result lands well below reality.

Related Tools

🧊

Martensite Fraction (Koistinen-Marburger)

Computes the fraction of austenite already transformed into martensite when quenching stops at a given temperature, using the Koistinen-Marburger equation, f = 1 − e^(−0.011·(Ms − Tq)), where Ms is the martensite start temperature and Tq the temperature at which the part stopped cooling. The result is the percentage of martensite formed — whatever is missing from 100 % stays as retained austenite, which is soft, dimensionally unstable and able to transform later in service, distorting the part. Because the exponent is linear in the temperature difference, 63 °C below Ms already converts half the austenite, but 209 °C are needed to reach 90 % and the end of the transformation is asymptotic, never exact — which is precisely why precision parts get a cryogenic treatment after quenching. Enter the steel Ms temperature and the quench stop temperature.

🌡️

Martensite Start Temperature Ms (Andrews)

Computes the Ms temperature, the point at which austenite starts transforming into martensite during quenching, using the linear Andrews equation: Ms(°C) = 539 − 423·C − 30.4·Mn − 17.7·Ni − 12.1·Cr − 7.5·Mo, with every content in mass percent. Nearly every element dissolved in austenite lowers Ms — cobalt and aluminium are the exceptions and raise it —, but carbon dominates by far: each 0.1 % of carbon drops Ms by 42 °C, nearly 14 times the effect of the same manganese content. Knowing Ms sets the martempering bath temperature, tells whether retained austenite will survive at room temperature, and predicts how severe the quenching stresses will be, because a low Ms makes the martensite expansion happen late, with the part already cold and rigid, and that is where cracks appear. The correlation is fitted to low-alloy steels with carbon up to roughly 0.6 %, and the page rejects compositions above 0.8 % carbon, where the extrapolation loses its footing. Enter the carbon, manganese, nickel, chromium and molybdenum contents.

🔬

Silt Density Index (SDI)

Computes the silt density index of ASTM D4189, the test that measures the fouling potential of the feed water of a reverse osmosis membrane: the sample is filtered through a 0.45 µm membrane at 207 kPa, the time to collect 500 mL is measured at the start and again at the end of the test, and the index is the percentage of flow loss divided by the duration. The expression is SDI = (1 − initial time ÷ final time) × 100 ÷ duration, and the number tells how much the filter plugged per minute of test: membrane makers usually require under 5 for a spiral wound element and under 3 for extended warranty, and water above that forces stronger coagulation or filtration upstream. The test is only valid if the flow loss stays below 75%; if the filter plugs before that, run it again with a shorter duration. The duration was adopted as an input instead of fixing 15 minutes, the standard value, precisely because poor water demands repeating at 10 or 5 minutes — results from different durations are not comparable, which is why the value is recorded as SDI₁₅, SDI₁₀ or SDI₅. Enter the initial time, the final time and the test duration.

💧

Larson-Skold Index (Water Corrosivity)

Computes the Larson-Skold index, the ratio between the aggressive and the protective anions in a water: chloride plus sulphate divided by alkalinity, all converted to milliequivalents per litre with the equivalent weights 35.45 for chloride, 48.03 for sulphate and 50.04 for alkalinity expressed as CaCO₃. The reading is direct: below 0.8 alkalinity dominates and the carbonate film protects carbon steel; between 0.8 and 1.2 corrosion stops being negligible; above 1.2 chloride and sulphate break the film and the localised corrosion rate takes off, the typical scenario of cooling tower makeup water running at many cycles of concentration. Unlike the Langelier index, this one does not say whether the water will scale — it measures only the corrosive power of the anions, which is why the two readings complement each other rather than compete. Total alkalinity was adopted as the input, instead of separate bicarbonate and carbonate, because that is what a routine laboratory reports, and converting it through the CaCO₃ equivalent returns exactly the sum of the two in milliequivalents per litre. Enter the chloride, the sulphate and the total alkalinity.

🐄

Temperature-Humidity Index (THI) for Cattle

Calculates the temperature-humidity index (THI) used to gauge heat stress in cattle, in the metric form of the 1971 NRC formula, from air temperature and relative humidity. Below 72 the animal is comfortable; 72 to 78 is alert, 79 to 88 is danger and above 88 is emergency. Enter temperature and relative humidity.

🍤

Frying Oil Temperature

Indicates ideal oil temperature by food type and computes preheat time.

The results provided by this tool are for general informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute professional, financial, medical, legal, tax or accounting advice. Always confirm important decisions with a qualified professional and official sources.