⚗️ Calculators

Bath Throwing Power (Haring-Blum)

Computes the throwing power of an electroplating bath from the Haring-Blum cell test, TP = 100 × (K − M) ÷ (K + M − 2), where K is the ratio of anode-to-cathode distances — the standard cell uses 5 to 1 — and M is the ratio between the mass deposited on the near cathode and the mass deposited on the far cathode. The number, as a percentage, measures how well the bath equalizes deposit thickness across areas of unequal access, such as recesses, holes and the inside of stamped parts, despite the difference in electrolyte resistance between the two paths. When M equals K the metal distributed exactly as the geometry predicted and throwing power is zero; when M reaches 1 both cathodes receive the same mass and the result is 100%; negative values appear when the bath deposits even less on the far cathode than geometry alone would predict, the notorious case of chromium baths. Alkaline and cyanide baths usually score best and bright acid baths worst, which is why picking the electrolyte matters more than raising the current when the part has awkward geometry. Enter the cell distance ratio and the ratio between the deposited masses.

Anode-to-cathode distance ratio (K) Ratio of deposited masses (M)

Result

—

Reading the Haring-Blum throwing power test

On a plating line, the part that fails inspection rarely fails on the flat face. It fails at the bottom of a hole, on an inner flange, in the recess where current arrives through more electrolyte resistance — thickness lands under spec and the part rusts ahead of schedule. The Haring-Blum cell puts that behaviour on a scale: two cathodes, one near the anode and one far from it, weighed after a run at fixed current. The result helps you tell whether the bath or the rack layout deserves the blame.

TP = 100 × (K − M) ÷ (K + M − 2), with K the ratio of the two anode-to-cathode distances — the standard cell runs 5 to 1 — and M the mass on the near cathode divided by the mass on the far one. That denominator marks Field's form of the index, which anchors zero at the primary current distribution: when M lands exactly on K, metal split the way geometry dictated and the bath added nothing. M equal to 1 means equal masses and a full 100%. The screen defaults, K = 5 and M = 3.2, give 29.03%.

The cell grades the bath inside its own geometry: flat parallel cathodes, no shielding, no Faraday cage, no forced agitation. A deep blind hole will still behave worse than the worst number measured here. Current density counts too — the same bath scores differently at 2 and at 8 A/dm², since the polarisation curve bends. And the mass ratio ignores cathode efficiency that varies with current density: in decorative chromium, where efficiency collapses in low-density areas, a negative reading describes the bath faithfully rather than flagging a botched weighing.

Frequently asked questions

What do the 29.03% from the default values tell me?

With K = 5 and M = 3.2 the screen prints 29.03%, to two decimals. In plain terms: geometry alone called for five times more metal on the near cathode, and the bath delivered 3.2 times, sending part of the difference to the far one. Zero would mean purely geometric distribution and 100% would mean equal thickness on both plates. Twenty-nine per cent counts as an honest score for a bright acid bath, while alkaline zinc usually measures well above that in the same cell.

Why does the K field reject 1 or anything below it?

At K = 1 both cathodes sit the same distance from the anode and nothing remains to compare: the denominator collapses to M − 1 and the index loses its meaning. The tool turns away K of 1 or less, M of zero or less, and any pair whose K + M fails to exceed 2, printing 'Check the values you entered.' instead of a number. In practice almost every lab keeps the 5 to 1 cell, since that spacing spreads the current enough without pushing ohmic drop to extremes.

Does a negative result mean I ran the test wrong?

Not on its own. Negative numbers show up whenever M exceeds K, that is, whenever the near cathode collected even more metal than geometry already predicted. Decorative chromium behaves exactly like this, since its cathode efficiency drops where current density drops, penalising the far plate twice over. With K = 5, an M of 8 returns −27.27%. Before blaming the bath, check that both panels went on the balance dry and that no deposit crept onto the back of the near cathode.

Related Tools

⚡

Faradaic Efficiency

Calculate the faradaic efficiency (current efficiency), η = (m_actual ÷ m_theoretical) × 100%, comparing the mass of product actually deposited or consumed with the theoretical mass predicted by Faraday's law for the charge that passed. The result, in %, measures what fraction of the current was actually used in the desired reaction; the rest is lost to side reactions (such as hydrogen or oxygen evolution) or short circuits. It is a key indicator in electrodeposition, industrial electrolysis, electroplating and batteries. Enter the actual mass obtained and the theoretical mass.

📐

Body Surface Area (Mosteller)

Compute BSA by Mosteller formula: BSA = √(h·w/3600).

⚗️

Coagulant Dosing

Calculate the coagulant consumption of a water treatment plant, consumption = flow × dose ÷ 1000, multiplying the treated flow (m³/day) by the coagulant dose (mg/L) set by jar test. The result, in kg/day, sizes the storage, dilution and dosing pumps for products such as aluminium sulphate, ferric chloride or PAC, ensuring efficient coagulation of colloidal particles. Enter the treated flow and the coagulant dose.

⚡

Buller-Woodrow Loss Factor

Estimates the loss factor of a distribution feeder from its load factor using the empirical Buller-Woodrow relation: loss factor = k × load factor + (1 − k) × load factor squared. The loss factor is the ratio of average loss to peak loss over the period, and it is what turns the instantaneous loss measured at peak hour into energy lost over the month without needing a recorded load curve. Because Joule loss varies with the square of the current, the loss factor always sits below the load factor, and the lower the load factor the lower the ratio between them: at a load factor of 0.20 the loss factor is under half of it, while at 0.80 it sits around 86% of its value. The coefficient k is an input rather than fixed at 0.30, the classic Buller-Woodrow value for distribution networks, because utilities recalibrate k between 0.15 and 0.50 according to the feeder load profile. Enter the load factor for the period and the coefficient k.

🌌

Telescope Resolving Power Diameter mm

Computes telescope angular resolving power in arcseconds using Dawes limit formula.

🍩

Torus Revolution Surface Calculator

Computes torus revolution surface area from major radius R and tube radius r using the 4 pi squared times R r formula.

The results provided by this tool are for general informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute professional, financial, medical, legal, tax or accounting advice. Always confirm important decisions with a qualified professional and official sources.