1001Ferramentas
💧 Calculators

Leaching Requirement (Irrigation)

Computes the leaching requirement of an irrigated field — the fraction of the applied depth that must pass through the root zone and drain away to flush out the salts the irrigation water leaves behind: LR = water EC ÷ (5 × tolerable saturation extract EC − water EC), with both electrical conductivities in decisiemens per metre. The tolerable EC comes from the crop salt tolerance table — beans sit near 1 dS/m, maize near 1.7 and barley above 8. The result, as a percentage, feeds the gross depth calculation, which is the net depth divided by (1 − LR): a requirement of 13.6%, for instance, forces you to apply about 16% more water than the crop consumes. The saltier the water relative to what the crop tolerates, the larger the fraction; and when the water EC approaches five times the tolerable EC the value blows up, a sign that this water is unusable for that crop without artificial drainage or a change of species. Enter the electrical conductivity of the irrigation water and the tolerable electrical conductivity of the soil saturation extract.

Result

Extra water to flush salt from the root zone

Well water in dry country arrives loaded with salt, and the crop drinks the water while leaving the salt behind. A season applying 600 mm at 1 dS/m — roughly 640 milligrams of salt per litre — drops close to four tonnes of salt per hectare, and it stays put until somebody pushes it below the roots. An irrigation designer who sizes the depth from evapotranspiration and application efficiency alone meets the problem as white crust on the surface and a weak field margin, at which point the fix costs drainage rather than water.

The fraction comes from the Rhoades equation: LR = ECw ÷ (5 × ECe − ECw), both conductivities in decisiemens per metre. ECw is the irrigation water, straight from the well or canal analysis — a river typically runs 0.2 to 0.5, a brackish crystalline-basement well 1 to 3. ECe is the salinity the chosen crop tolerates in the soil saturation extract: beans near 1.0, maize 1.7, cotton 7.7, barley above 8. The 5 in the denominator belongs to surface and sprinkler irrigation; for high-frequency drip, FAO swaps in twice the salinity that kills yield outright, which lands lower, so this screen errs on the safe side there.

The model runs in steady state: free drainage under the root zone, with no shallow water table and no compacted layer holding water up, and no meaningful rainfall, since rain leaches for free and cuts the calculated requirement. It covers total salinity only. Sodicity is a separate matter, read through SAR and ESP, and sodic water calls for gypsum rather than more water, since leaching without fixing sodium disperses clay and seals the profile. On units: µS/cm over a thousand gives dS/m, mmho/cm equals dS/m, and a 1:1 or 1:5 extract reading, being more dilute, sits lower and inflates the fraction if it lands in that field.

Frequently asked questions

With the defaults, how much extra water do I apply?
Defaults are 1.2 dS/m in the water and 2.0 dS/m of tolerance in the saturation extract, and the screen returns 13.64%. That figure is the share of what you apply that has to drain, rather than the extra depth itself. Gross depth follows from dividing net depth by (1 − 0.1364), that is by 0.8636: 5 mm net becomes 5.79 mm, close to 16% more. The increase stacks on top of the correction for application efficiency, never in place of it.
I changed the crop and the number jumped. Why did that happen?
Crop tolerance sits in the denominator, and that denominator is small. Holding the water at 1.2 dS/m, moving tolerance from 2.0 to 1.0 — the bean threshold — takes the requirement from 13.64% to 31.58%, and gross depth ends up 46% larger than net. At the other end, barley at 8.0 dS/m asks for only 3.09%. Same water in all three cases; what changed is who drinks it. On a brackish-water scheme, crop choice outweighs irrigation management.
In which cases does the page refuse to calculate?
Whenever either conductivity comes in at zero or below, and whenever water EC reaches five times the tolerated EC — with the default tolerance of 2.0 dS/m, that starts at 10 dS/m in the water. The refusal carries physical meaning: at that point the denominator vanishes and the fraction would run to infinity, which amounts to saying that no depth of water, however generous, keeps the root zone under the limit. Water like that demands a different crop, blending with a better source, or artificial drainage.

Related Tools

💧

Gross Irrigation Depth

Calculate the gross irrigation depth, D_gross = D_net ÷ Ef, dividing the required net depth (the water that must reach the roots, in mm) by the irrigation system's application efficiency (decimal). The result, in mm, is the depth the system must actually apply so that, after losses (evaporation, drift, percolation, runoff), the net depth remains in the soil. More efficient systems (drip, ~90%) require less gross depth than less efficient ones (conventional sprinkler, ~75%; surface, ~50-60%). It is the basis of irrigation design and management. Enter the net depth and the application efficiency.

⏱️

Irrigation Time

Calculate the required irrigation time, t = depth ÷ application intensity, dividing the depth to apply (mm) by the system's application intensity (mm/h). The result, in hours, is how long the system (sprinkler, pivot, drip) must run to apply the desired depth. The application intensity must not exceed the soil's infiltration rate, or it causes runoff and erosion. Multiplied by the flow, it gives the water volume; combined with the number of sectors, it sets the total irrigation time of the area. It is a routine calculation in daily irrigation management. Enter the depth and the application intensity.

📊

Field Efficiency

Calculate the field efficiency of a mechanized operation, Ef = (effective capacity ÷ theoretical capacity) × 100%, dividing the effective field capacity (area actually worked per hour) by the theoretical capacity (the one obtained with no time losses). The result, in %, measures how much of the time the machine actually works, as opposed to headland turns, refills, adjustments, travel and overlaps. Simple operations in large fields have high efficiency (80-90%); complex operations in small, irregular fields, low (60-70%). Improving field efficiency (larger fields, fewer stops) reduces costs. Enter the effective and theoretical capacities.

🔢

Fraction Calculator

Add, subtract, multiply and divide fractions. Simplifies to lowest terms and converts to decimal.

💧

Irrigation Water Amount per Crop

Estimates liters of water per hectare per day for irrigation by crop type.

💪

Drawbar Pull

Calculate the available drawbar pull of a tractor, F = W × μ, multiplying the weight on the driving wheels W (kN) by the traction coefficient μ of the tire-soil pair. The result, in kN, is the pulling effort the tractor can exert on implements (plow, harrow, planter) — limited by soil grip, not engine power. The traction coefficient depends on soil and tire type (0.5 to 0.7 on firm soil; much less on loose or wet soil). Increasing the adhesive weight (ballast) raises the available force. Enter the adhesive weight and the traction coefficient.

The results provided by this tool are for general informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute professional, financial, medical, legal, tax or accounting advice. Always confirm important decisions with a qualified professional and official sources.